From: Kate
Date: 3 December 1997
Subject: another dose of slush
after a long silence, prepare the sick bags.
an annoyingly happyhappy dose of slush.
i'll get back to grumbling aboutbeing cold and broke and out of work soon.
--k
no names have been changed to protect the guilty. deal with it.
--
back to pacifica...
So long since writing, I wonder that my hand still knows the shapes and
forms them with any fluency. So long since writing, I wonder how to entangle
these two months into words.
A too short time, a glimpse of shared life saturated with love, that barely
lasted a moment and has left me craving for more and more.
The time in california seems like several ages ago--from the draggingly
long flight out and the frustration and grumbling when there was no snarl
to meet me (but the smilingly helpful and slightly hesistant t4 instead).
And the slight awkwardness of conversation with someone when i was flightblasted
and impatient--the difficulty of being delighted to meet someone at last,
but looking over their shoulder, and foot-tapping for the arrival of another.
(I felt so appallingly rude.)
Those first two days in Pacifica (in a tiny motel by the beach, just eleven
rooms) are a blur or rainstorms and black waves with fluid-fire dragon crests
of white of salt spray and coffee laden breakfast, of ice cube fights, and
pretzels and delighted touches and smiles. an exchange of presents, endless
kisses, dazed recognition. the shock of physical closeness again--the luxury
of touching a smile with fingertips and not just memory. the rediscovery of
texture and scent and warmth. remembering squirming under a tightly drawn
white sheet, and the touch of warm breathy kisses through the cold cotton.
glow in the dark ghosties. magenta on the side of a half climbed hill, outside
a multi-coloured house. a maid with impossibly bad timing fumbling to unlock
the door. the smell of gitanes and cranberry juice and garlic and skin. the
phantom sea-borne circus music late in the night. the almost-naked tattooed
man leaning into the rain, carrying a chair back and forth, barefoot on the
asphalt. garlicky finger-sticky food shared in a room decorated with the strangest
1970s cut-out wooden fish shapes. sitting bundled in clothes on a bench in
the darkness, watching the storm build as the wind whisked away scraps of
paper and smoked bubbles. watching the birds scurry across the beach, peckpecking
into the sand and seaweed heaps.
then a bright morning, all packed, sitting on the rocks smoking cigarettes,
warming skin in the sun and sipsipping coffee from a paper cup with orange
patterns. then one huge waves breaks high up over the rocks, crashing water
over half of me and at least as much of a. so we run round, squawking and
giggling, spinning around to avoid a persistant wasp as well, and we clutch
coffee and wait. half talking to some plump tourists who ask me how i like
america, and admire my accent and my scarf. then jen appears, (spotted across
the car park by her bright blondness) to whisk us away. we hover about and
stand all chitty-chat and pausing till the cab arrives, and jen passes her
wallet on a chain (painted with daisies) back and forth between her hands,
grinning, as i lean back against snarl and realise how incredibly happy i
am just to be with him again.
[and i am playing with a little rubbery octupus toy and a wooden lion, and
i admire my crayons in their smart new crayon case, and can only think of
this, from anima poetae, by coleridge:
"if a man could pass though Paradise in a dream, and have a flower presented
to him as a pledge that his soul had really been there, and if he found that
flower in his hand when he awoke--then Ay!-- and what then" ]
at jen's, walking up and down wooden steps overhung with trees, we dump
out bags and produce presents, and play with her cats for what seems like
an age--flickflickering a feather on a boingy stick back and forth for leaping
alien cat, as jen wakes them growl and pounce by tormenting them with her
new sea-otter toy. the sun seems so bright and stark as we walk along the
ocean side (blocked out by a think wooden fence, the gaps making the waves
seem something like a jumpy zoetrope. 25 cents a look. drop a quarter to see
real waves action! lifelike ocean movements! roll up! roll up!)
jason is awake and playing computer games when we return with caffeine in
our blood, and after some very quiet hello stuff, not yet hungry at all, I
change and jen walks outside with us to show us the way down to the beach.
zigzag chain edged wooden steps down down a cut in the cliffside to the
ocean. we strip off our shoes and socks (blimey! a silver toenail! how did
he get that? i just have bluegreen shreddings on my fingernails. somewhat
less stylish.) and dig toes into the sand, grinning at each other like little
kids on holiday.
dazzlebright sun on the waves making the water silverywhite, so foamy as
it slides up over the beach. foot sinking into the sand, muscles stretching,
we wander off to the right, between water and overtowering crumbly orange
cliffs (carved with letters and nicknames, some eight feet high), making curve
patterns with out steps. dance-running in and out of the surf, both with
rolled up trousers and dangling shoes, surprised and soaked with hit by unexpectedly
high water surging up our thighs to wrap cold around the hips. and it dries
fast in this sunshine (i could already feel the freckles breeding on my skin)
but leaves coastlines of salt on black fabric. we write nonsense to each
other in the sand, but it vanishes back into the ocean in moments. my skin
is tight and redenning (pale english skin), but we sit and bask and i am
more dazzled by a and his love than by the brightest sun. walking back, past
the small boy learning to surf and the woman walking with her panting, sand-digging
dog, the distance misting with bright sun through spray, leaving drift rubbish
and flattened sculpture sillhouettes in the distance, panting up the many
many steps.
now starving, we walk through the almost deserted shops, indecisive (jen
has walked us to the end of the road, a remarkably placid cat in her arms,
along for the ride). we end up eating pizza and a mound of sald, drenched
with gloopy dressing as i shiver and complain about the cold now that the
sun is falling, and my half-burned skin goosebumps with chill. we buy the
biggest pomegranate in the world, and gallons of juice to drink with vodka,
and return. jason is playing oddworld, jen is on the computer. we ooh and
ahh and coo over the graphics of the game some more, watching jason play,
giggling stupidly and repeating the 'hay-lo' and 'ooo-kay' and 'follow me'
voices. but this is dull, so we half play cards and sipsip at our drinks and
i want to jump around in front of the screen and say 'talk to us! look, we're
cool! let's go out to play!' but there is only murmured conversation and
tight, tangible awkwardness and eventually either snarl or i doze off curled
against the other (perhaps we both do) untill it seems that perhaps we should
sleep after all. the futon is unfurled and dressed up in fine coloured sheets
and skittish cats rampage over and under the bed as snarl and i wrap around
each other in sleep. woken viciously early by the surprise of sunlight and
the chirping of birds, restless, i wake snarl in the nicest way i can think
of and we wriggle and rustle under the covers, he purring quietly, me rather
muffled when we have to leap from edging towards pleasure to blinking just
woken up and respectable as someone makes getting up noises and emerges from
a bedroom.
a slowish morning of coffee and reading papers and talking of films and
smoking, leaning against the railings outside the fresh paint smelling coffeehouse,
then back to get stuff and talk with jen about heading into the city, to see
a film before meeting up with others of the BAM crew for dinner. bus to the
BART up and down steep house lined hills, that i remember as candy-pastel
coloured, overwhelmingly, but feel that i am misremembering, with glimpses
of the sea pulling further away. an oddly coloured train, after a confusion
of change and machines and tickets, then a wander through an oddly interlinked
mall place, for lunch of salad and fries and litres of diet coke (got to love
those free refills) and a search for key cutting and phone and the essential
purchase of a large sparkly glow in the dark ball (left, eventually, for dag)
before seeing wenders' new film, the end of violence.
...
and now i try to put myself back onto a small balcony, blowing bubbles down
onto neatly clipped suburban grass, vertical lines of a blind clattering behind
us as i watch you, in frayed edge cutoffs and tightlaced boots, smoke a cigarette
down to the very end...and i try to order the events of those days in california
in my mind, and i know that they will jumble.
that friday, a movie. a disconnected, menacing, observed voyeurism with
startling clarity and terrible awkward interactions ringing false, unsettling
power and perfect tension, but grating voiceovers. i need to see it again,
i think. we three, jen, snarl and i, walk from there through a half remembered
city to the stinking rose to meet the others for dinner. we are shockingly
early, so stand and smoke outside the place with an almost conversation until
dagard, harper, ford and some_name appear. (dagard lanky and boinging around,
with a leaning back peering forwards out at the world through colourshimmying
shades grin...harper all neatly packed in and grinning wide with contained
energy and shiny friendliness...ford an amused and chatty observer with unsettling
eyes and gossamer hair...some_name a computer tshirted, blue ribboned, nervy
newcomer.) we are ushered into a booth at the back after a jumble of hellos
and handshakes, and sit in a tangle of elbows under a ceiling looped around
and around with the longest garlic string, surrounded by disconcertingly bright
painted picture walls. a plump, rainbow-braced camp waiter is overfriendly
with his greetings patter and i feel like we have mistakenly wandered into
dinner in a sitcom as with listen with polite smirks and a few swallowed laughs
to his routine about his computer order-pad. drinks. food. talk. nonsense.
friendly-warm. for a garlic restaurant, there is general surprise about how
not-very-garlicky the food is, excepting the pulpy mush to spread on warm
bread, tasty oily mouthwarming food. a pleasant blur...mix of old friends
regathering and newcomers tangling in old jokes and retold stories (the shorthand
of friends) and greeting explanations and edging to find the conversation
ground that can support everyone. i fold and fold salad leaves, popping them
into my mouth, as other food is demolished and moved around and devoured.
as always, i am surprised by how rapidly an american restaurant meal can pass--no
lingering between courses, no long gap between initial order and food, no
bottles of wine to finish over last finger pickings of shared dishes and
cigarette smoke. dagard, snarl and i rush out for a between courses smoke
and after we agree to drink across the road, at a favoured bar of dagard's.
but there is a flurry of fire engines that appear and cluster and disgorge
firemen weighed down with body-wrapped hoses...then disperse. then return
in a clamour of sirens, and vanish again in a disappointed confusion. and
we point out the bizarre signs on the smut shop on the corner, and note that
they have an entirely unenticing special offer on their lingerie...while jen
battles with dag's phone in the screaming noise of traffic and crowds and
sirens, calling and calling more and stomping up and down the street before
we flow across the road in straggling chattering lines. cluster in the reddish
light glow by the windows in the noisy bar and i make sarky not-understood
comments about red-light areas (which are hardly worth explaining in the sorry,
can you say that again bar noise) and dag explains her policy of generous
tipping and we order drinks. pints of guinness all round for the blokes. i
get teased for not liking the stuff...though i explain how i have tried and
tried to like it, even practiced hard, but always failed. so i order a newcastle
brown, which most people try and go yumyum about. jen drinks more and more
diet coke and gets twitchy and jumpy as she tells us, apologising over and
over, that we will be staying with dagard from now on...not returning with
her. all the reasons are unclear (a falling out with hausmate jason, it seems,
unexplained. undercurrents.) snarl and i blink at each other, amazed. just
a few hours ago she had a spare key made for us. shrugshrug, no no problem.
dag so welcoming it seems churlish to complain. flurry of now what. seems
that jen will collect out stuff and bring it over in the morning. sure, sure,
we're fine for the night. got all we need. and i get a heartsinking rush of
everything going wrong. but dag is patting me on the knee, obviously worried
by the blank look on my face, telling me how he will take us home on the train
and put us up and give us beer and make us at home and break our brains and
provide clean towels. so what can we do but nodnod and thank him and ask
jen to please please stop apologising.
so, as the evening gets more beery in this corner of a clamoured bar, and
harper hangs out of the window to greet a surprised group of old friends (sorority
sisters), and we watch those who hover outside in the street, and jen is
whisked away by golden boy, it seems the time has come to move. an early
night for a city...and the reality of a long journey into the outskirts of
suburbia, to i have no idea where. a giggly hand-holding, hand-waving, stompstomp
walk down hills, and across town past darkened restaurants and shops, past
bars wth half-told stories of other nights of drinking, to part near a bus
stop. a bus, then, to a train station, with dag's reassuring repeition of
the process of our journey, of what awaits us. we smoke a final cigarette
on the platform before clambering up the narrow stairs to the top of the shiny
metal double-decker train and nest in an end corner, talktalking about everything
and nothing, adn the evening and about words and movies and geeky stuff and
work as we rattle and edge slowly out of the city into the reaches of the
bay area. and i become sleepy and fight to stay awake as i lean against snarl
for warmth and comfort and reassurance in this uncertain change of plans
flung at us, and after an hour of starting and stopping in the dark, we get
off and shiver at the bus stop, waiting, smoking, checking change, yawning...a
bus, an odd exchange with a kid who wants to borrow dag's phone, a scamper
across an over wide street, a walk past a boarded up wooden building with
a shiny coke machine glowing outside it, round a pristine corner to an apartment
building with long brightly lit corridors and a clean plainness that feels
like a hotel, into dag's apartment. jen it seems has already been here...our
cases and bags are by the door. a beer, a chat, a bed made up, a wish of
'sleep well, kids'. and we hold each other tight and i fall asleep with a
bemused 'where the fuck am i' sensation.
[yuck, the chocolate syrupy dregs of this mocha at the bottom, hiding under
the coffee...tongue coating thick sweet intense.]
...
ack, this cold is dreadful. i want to pee all the time, but dread the bathroom
and the shedding of layers...
...
so, the next day. a saturday. snarl and i wake with kisses and caresses
and smothered laughter on an early morning, to the sound of a shower crashing
waking up dag. he heads off on errands (bill paying and juice buying) and
once again, on his return, we are thrown into the struggle for instant respectability
as a key turns in a lock. dag is all smiles and breakfast offering and talkative
in the sunny bright room, half filtered through long blind slats and a breeze
through a meshed door. we learn the house rules...drink the beer, be nice,
relax, don't feel obliged to do anything, there's the television...so relaxed
and generous is our host that i feel less perplexed, and thankful that someone
is so kind as to take on two waifs and strays, the pawns in a hausmate struggle
eslewhere. i find out where we are...mountain view, near palo alto, and menlo
park. deep in the tidiness of silicon valley. there are no plans for the day,
as far as i misremember, so we wander out for coffee and read papers and
generally hang out in the way that only americans seem able to do...with low
level conversation and some television and some beer. and later, chinese food.
huge mounds of food that comes in folding cardboard boxes, and handfuls of
fortune cookies, and is that the day dag comes home with a clinking cardboard
box of nitrous? perhaps. i refrain, but smirk and giggle as snarl makes peculiar
snorting and gasping sounds and his eyes spin around and he crashes back onto
the bed giggling his face off, whilst dag breathes long and deep without a
squeak or a giggle, just a not-quite there head spinning grin on his face.
a drug i know nothing about, so one i avoid...not being someone who steps
out into an unknown chemical. too unsettled to experiment blindly. i stick
to the beer. but if it is that evening, sleeper, another mooer, comes over,
and joins in, and i feel horribly straight and not terribly entertaining,
but snarl falls asleep, all sprawled out in my arms on the bed in the sitting
room while we watch tv some more and talk idly between the deep inhalations.
so i parcel snarl up into bed when they depart, to elsewhere or to bed, struggling
with his warm, crashed out body to remove belt and jeans and tuck him under
the covers. but even half comatose dead asleep, he wraps his arms around me
in his dreams, pulling me close and nuzzling into my skin, making me smile
with closeness and the reassurance of being wanted.
and this continues to amaze me...i have always been someone who has felt
every bone and lump and discomfort and deadmuscle when wrapped around someone,
even just curled on a sofa...tolerating it for short periods for politeness...but
with this man i find that we interlock and fit so well, that it gives me great
pleasure to nestle, not feeling trapped in a nocturnal embrace of warm skin
and sleeping breath, or in a filmwatching sofa bundle...just a melting of
edges into a single physicality. interlaced limbs, tangled fingers, pillowed
heads and one breath.
oh, and there are now two cats in the apartment...ejn's creatures. she and
the felines have moved out...we were not the only ones evicted. and still
we don't have the full story, but all night the cats wander and fret and sometimes
curl but wake up with scratchscratchscratching in their space-pod litter
box. i wake up and bribe them with crunchy food and they settle for a while,
then scratchscrath again. snarl and i decide that marcel (the more normal
cat) is not really called marcel, but called claude. this seems to be his
secret name, the real name of the cat. and zoot is an alien. a tiny handful
of cat with no fur, just the warm wrinkly underfur of a devon rex, except
for proper bunnyfur around her ears and on her legs. she feels to warm...all
uninsulated and radiating, like warm suede. huge eyes and batlike ears and
a crazed expression. another night she keeps trying to get under the covers
of out bed, and i freak out, convinced that she will get squashed, and the
feeling of her against my skin disturbs me because she is more hamster than
cat, and too fragile.
and sunday was a day of rollercoasters.
---
From: SAGReiss
Date: 4 December 1997
Subject: Today de Gaulle, tomorrow the Emperor
The men's room at the Theatre National. Charles_de_Gaulle and Georges_Pomipdou
stand side by side at the urinals.
Georges_Pompidou [to Charles_de_Gaulle]: Quelle belle piece.
Charles_de_Gaulle [to Georges_Pompidou]: Pompidou, je vous en prie. Regardez
devant vous.
From: Kate
Date: 4 December 1997
Subject: (art-jobs) Erotica Writers Needed
thought this was worth passing on...after all, "Writers will be unusually
well compensated."
--k
>From: tomas
>Subject: (art-jobs) Erotica Writers Needed
>
>"Erotasy"- a San Francisco publisher of erotic literature,
>is again soliciting submissions from writers.
>
>We want unpublished works by authors known and unknown.
>We are seeking short stories (1500-10,000 words), for inclusion
>in a new collection to be marketed online, as well as in print.
>
>Writers will be unusually well compensated.
>(Note: this is a request for submissions, not a job posting)
>
>We look for erotic stories as smooth as wet silk,
>stimulating and provocative, without beating us over the head.
>
>This is NOT the stereotypical slam-bang porno-for-pinheads that
>is free (and worth it) all over the Net.
>
>This is literature that recognizes our sexuality as full of
>mystery, suspense, longing, foreboding, and taboo, even humor.
>Straight, Gay, Casual, Committed are all OK.
>NO non-consensual or under-age stories. NO sleazy porn.
>
>Think- Anais Nin, Marianna Beck, Isabel Allende - Mary Smith (one need
>not be famous to create well), think compelling, tightly written
>literature that just happens to be erotic.
>
>Send manuscripts by *snail mail* only, please.
>Include a SASE for our reply, your phone and email address.
> We Am Press
> 3145 Geary Blvd, Ste. 17
> San Francisco, CA 94118
>
>
>____________________________________________________
>for more on craigs-list browse http://www.cnewmark.com [art-jobs posting
85]
>
and:
"Erotasy"- a San Francisco publisher of quality erotic literature, is looking
for a serial-writer of erotic stories.
We want someone capable of producing a weekly chapter of compelling, tightly
written erotic serial story. This will be an interactive serial, responsive
to the input of readers. Editorial and deadline experience is a big plus.
This is a contract position. Compensation is negotiable.
From: SAGReiss
Date: 4 December 1997
Subject: High security, low budget
We celibrated the Emperor's birthday last night at the Rainier Club. The
guest of honor was not present, but security was still tense. The Consul General
of Japan and Germany were both there. A new Axis alliance? (The Consul General
in a medium-sized city like Seattle is someone's brother-in-law, the two
thousand five hundred and forty-third most important political appointee of
his government. We are all waiters and waitresses who have served some higher-calibre
men of power. I served tea to Brian Mulroney, as you know, as well as Senator
Partick Moynihan, who arrived two hours late and too drunk to deliver his
featured speech.) About half way through the reception we ran out of food
for the buffet. I was cocktailing and didn't really care. Discrete enquiries
were made. The verdict: no more food. This was no sushi bar. There were shitty
little spring rolls, hors d'oeuvres and turkey leftover from Thanksgiving.
I guess the stock market/real estate/currency crash has taken its toll on
the entertainment budget of the representatives of the Imperial throne.
From: SAGReiss
Date: 6 December 1997
Subject: Hospitality
Yesterday this scruffy family of three, two drunken hippie parents and a
teenage daughter, came in for breakfast, steak & eggs, omelettes with
guacamole and salsa, beer and coffee. I am of course partial to all parties
who drink, no matter how bad they smell. I took care of them well, and vice
versa. This morning, dead with one big lunch party I wasn't doing because
I was hosting, they call up room service and order eggs benedict, a club sandwich
and nachos. I conned the cook into making it for me and earned twelve bucks.
They called back later for jalapeno peppers and more guacamole and salsa.
I had to charge them, since the chef was there. He said three bucks, but
I didn't add my automatic fifteen-percent gratuity. It seemed rude. Another
five bucks for the trained food-service professional. At ten past two, just
after I had turned away some cheap assholes who wanted coffee, they called
again asking for the key to the laundry room. I brought it up. After I had
finished my books and drawer, I heard them walking down the hall. They saw
the gate closed. I stuck out my head and heard: "Here's our friend. Can we
have a beer while we wait for a taxi?" I opened the gate: "Well, we're closed,
but rules were made to be broken." I served them two bottles of beer. I went
back into the kitchen: "Tim, I've got two people who've been taking care of
me all week-end. They just want a beer, but I've closed the register. I can't
say: 'Sorry, we're closed.' I'll get cash and ring it up tomorrow. I just
don't want to be fired for an unnatural act of kindness to the guests." Another
five bucks for the trained food-service professional. Sometimes it looks
too easy.
From: Nichelle
Date: 7 December 1997
Subject: I think this is one of my favorite guest descs.
Despite her pale color and the unhappiness which clings to her the way a
bad dream clings to a rumpled pillowcase, she is lovely. Her hair, as straight
and red as ketchup rides gravity's one-way ticket all the way to her waist;
her blue eyes are as soft and moist as huevos rancheros and the soft curl
of thier lashes cause fimbrillante shadows to fall on the swell of her cheek.
She is b-not a tall girl, yet the legs which hang out of her short grey skirt
are those of a tall woman and beneath her tight wite t-shirt her astonishingly
round breasts jiggle ever so slightly like balls balanced on the noses of
valu-valium eating seals.
Nichelle
From: SAGReiss
Date: 11 December 1997
Subject: bgates@cheap.com
Dear MSN Member,
As we indicated in our recent letter to you, we at MSN believe it's vital
that all members are able to share equally in the full array of services,
information, and entertainment offered by MSN. Unfortunately, the misuse of
membership privileges by some members prevents others from being able to
enjoy the benefits of their membership on MSN.
We are concerned that the large number of hours your account continues to
be logged on to MSN in recent months may indicate inappropriate use of The
Microsoft Network. Our records show that [sagreiss] was logged on 325.94 hours.
This kind of online time may suggest that either your account has been logged
on simultaneously on more than one computer or that your computer has been
left unattended while still logged on for long periods of time. We ask that
members using MSN in this way take corrective action immediately.
Because these practices can obstruct the use of MSN by other members, it
is a violation of the MSN Member Agreement.
It may be helpful to remember that since the beginning of the year, MSN
has tripled its connection access and there is no longer a reason to stay
logged on when leaving your computer. You can now be confident that you'll
be able to reconnect at any time quickly and easily. Another tool you may
find useful in the newest release of MSN is a handy new feature called Quick
View; it features a time-tracking device that lets you know how long you've
been connected to the service.
If you have questions concerning this issue, please send e-mail using the
link below. Please note that only questions addressed to this e-mail alias
will be answered.
mailto:MSN_Usage@msn.com
We hope that all of our members will work together to make MSN the best
online experience for everyone.
Thanks!
MSN Member Communications Team
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sir or Madam,
Further to your letter entitled "Account Usage Alert - 2nd Notice" I would
like to give voice to my concerns. First of all, I believe I am billed for,
and pay for, unlimited internet access, so I don't see how I could be "misusing"
or abusing your services. Second, you suggest that I may be logging on simultaneously
from two different computers, which is obviously impossible, since I sometimes
cannot reconnect soon after logging off because my "account is already in
use". Third, you suggest that I may be "idling" online, which is also impossible
because my account logs off automatically when inactive. Last, if you are
so suspicious of your members' enjoyment of the services they purchase from
you, perhaps you could check my account, instead of making baseless accusations,
and see that I only log on from my home phone (206) 324-7468. Suffice it to
say that I am a little unhappy with your letter and hope for an explanation.
Respectfully,
Scott Alexander Gabriel Reiss
From: Columbine
Date: 11 December 1997
Subject: Re: bgates@cheap.com
Go Gabriel go! Chew their asses.
I'm tempted to actually succumb to the wiles of the devil and get an MSN
account just to see if I can earn a letter like this. I'd frame it and put
it on the wall.
From: SAGReiss
Date: 16 December 1997
Subject: Choose your pathology
At first I thought I had pissed off bgates' minions and they had finally
toaded my internet-addicted ass. But no, the servers are just down for cleaning.
My guess is they won't toad anyone who isn't selling something seriously illegal.
They just try to intimidate the so-called misusers into connecting for fewer
than three hundred hours a month. Fuck them. I can always get another account.
Shiiit, I'm working about fifty hours a week. Because of Columbine's weird
copyright fetish, I have no printed text to work with. I can't see what the
problem is with stealing free shit off the 'net, unless one makes a profit
on it. If the fruit of my labor is selling, I think I should get a reasonable
cut. Otherwise I don't care what becomes of it and have no scruples about
down- or up-loading anyone else's shit. So long as it's free, what difference
does it make? Who gives a fuck? I'm an expert neither on TV nor homosexuality.
I never watched TV in Europe and haven't seen much Amerikan TV since the
mid-seventies. I believe it's true that there is a little more T&A on
French television. I don't count this among the obvious superiorities of
French culture. These people also pay to import Starsky and Hutch, a very
big series over there. It might be tempting to consider the relative tolerance
of accute alcoholism as freedom, but that is just freedom of my particular
pathology. France is certainly not a bastion of gay rights. Male homosexuality
is struck with the same kind of opprobrium in France as elsewhere, most everywhere.
(Female homosexuality is seen, there and here, as a charming hobby, harmless
and even titilating, to make a bad pun.) There is no escape from sexual prohibitions,
incest codes at their most fundamental, to make another bad pun. There are
no sexually-liberated societies. Society is the enemy of sexual liberty. That
these codes vary from one culture to the next is no more surprising than
that the Russian language has two words for "brother-in-law", one meaning
my sister's husband, the other meaning my wife's brother. The high-brow and
low-brow representations I've seen of (again male) homosexuality do suggest
to me that it is pathological behavior. While I enjoyed Les Nuits fauves and
The Living End, I don't think they represent healthy lifestyle choices any
more than The Lost Weekend or Under The Volcano. My experience (admittedly
limited) with the working-class sisters confirms this impression. Their own
she's-a-ho mentality does little to uphold comforting middle-class values,
which are, socially, healthy ones. Of course I don't know the doctors and
lawyers who poke one another up the butt in the comfort of their tastefully
decorated homes. I don't know anyone who owns a home. Disney is another story.
What I imagine as the real behind-the-scenes tale is quite simply that very
few straight men would ever want to work there, so what choice have they got?
Still, let us not confuse rights, the few and generally well-protected, from
privileges, many and myriad and subject to negociation. As I understand it
this is an issue in the gay rights community, whether to let NAMBLA join the
Pride Parade and whatnot. There is a difference between outlawing bum-fuckery
and not granting insurance coverage to Buttboy. Gay marriage is asking society
to sanction and approve of what the boiz do. That seems unreasonable to me.
While I have no particular problem with it, it doesn't seem like a right to
me. Right to marry? Can I marry my heiffer, or negatron his goose? Same goes
for NEA grants. While I don't much care that my tax dollars are wasted on,
among other worthless things, homo-porno-photo exhibits, I can understand
that some people only want to pay for socially-uplifting art, as oxymoronic
as that may sound. Shiiit, Nichelle thinks that all sodomy is pathological.
The other day in the employee break room at the Rainier Club there was this
really annoying bitch whining about her imaginary health problems, and one
of the real flamers said, with a quiet dignity I much admire: "I'm HIV positive."
Choose your pathology indeed.
From: Columbine
Date: 16 December 1997
Subject: Re: Choose your pathology
>Because of
>Columbine's weird copyright fetish, I have no printed text to work with.
mouth organ has the same policy I do: if you don't repost it in a public
forum and don't make any money off it, then by all means go ahead and quote
it.
The latter part is the more important one: if we don't make any bucks from
our own words, why should you? Which is basically what you said.
As for the former, "public" is subjective, I admit - and the bookkeeping
is a mess: I don't mind being quoted on this list (which I consider private)
but I would mind seeing words from my web pages appear on YOUR web page, which
I consider public. But things which I say here are fair game for you or Nichelle
to repost on your web pages. That doesn't bother me. Anything I say here,
the world can have. Hell, I dunno. I know it when I see it.
>Male homosexuality
>is struck with the same kind of opprobrium in France as elsewhere, most
>everywhere. (Female homosexuality is seen, there and here, as a charming
>hobby, harmless and even titilating, to make a bad pun.)
Not sure I buy this. Male homosexuality is ignored and tolerated by the
majority in France, as far as I can tell from the footprints; it is loathed
and feared by the majority here.
I agree that female homosexuality is *always* perceived as less threatening,
a colorful and harmless quirk. Why this should be, I do not know. Nor do my
coeditors.
>There are no sexually-liberated societies. Society is the
>enemy of sexual liberty.
That's a tad extreme, isn't it? I'm not saying society is a friend of sexual
liberty; I'm just wondering if there's any connection between the two at all.
>Of course I >don't know the doctors and lawyers who poke one another
up the butt in >the comfort of their tastefully decorated homes. I don't
know anyone who owns a home.
I do and they're mostly normal. (Well, they're sometimes jerks, but only
to the same statistical extent that all doctors and lawyers are - which is
to say, often.)
The stories you tell me suggest to me sometimes that you work with people
who would be pathological whether they're straight or gay. I suggest, again,
that the two are unconnected.
From: SAGReiss
Date: 17 December 1997
Subject: Vivent les pedes
I'm not sure where you get your information on homosexuality in France.
If it comes from tourists, be suspicious. Paris and Nice are not France,
any more than New York and Los Angeles are Amerika. It has always amused
me that the so-called cultural diversity crowd would be literally incapable
of functioning in any culture outside of Amerika, possibly outside of Amerikan
academia. If one thinks English is a gender-sensitive language... Anyway
we could change our references to, say, Gide and Genet or Hubert Selby and
John Rechy. Or we could go back to that most shrewed observer of gender-bending
and socio-sexual repression, my friend Sade. In one of his most famous, outraged
self-defences, he deplores female adultery, because of the unhappy social
consequences, and notes that he has never compromised a married woman. (One
must remember how ironic and self-serving his justifications always are.
One biographer astutely pointed out that he never seems so guilty and criminal
as when he is in the right, denying having committed a crime which in fact
he did not commit.) From the age of about sixteen, when he left the Jesuits
to join the cavalry, described by his superior officer as "Fort brave, fort
derange", no respectably-married woman would have anything to do with him.
However I think he puts his finger on the socio-biological fact which has
always had a deep influence on how male and female sexuality are viewed.
No one knows his father, and no man knows his child. DNA testing might change
this, but only if it becomes wide-spread. I'm not sure how this bears on
male-female homosexuality, but I think it might. An amusing article I read
by a gay-boy stopping in Seattle on a national book tour suggested that human
sexuality could be summed up by the fact (He didn't cite sources.) that male
homosexual couples had sex an average of three times a week, heterosexual
couples twice a week, lesbian couples once a week. I have very little experience
with dykes, except that they are thought to be cheap in restaurant circles,
possibly male-homosexual, misogynistic propaganda. Again data are hard to
come by. As I said to Nichelle last night, restaurant workers tend to experiment
more with exotic food, blacks tend to see things in racial terms, homosexuals
define their individual and group identity by what goes on between the sheets.
It doesn't suprise me that promiscuity or S&M would flourish among them,
if indeed it does, and I may be wrong about that. What would one expect to
see in a gay gift shop, if not the little porno toys Nichelle was describing
to me? What is gay, if it is not in some way related to sex?
From: Columbine
Date: 17 December 1997
Subject: Re: Vivent les pedes
I confess, when I think France I think Paris ... and Paris is the source
of most of my information ... and I get extremely irate when people assume
all of Louisiana is like New Orleans (not coincidentally the only urban, halfway
gay-friendly part of a largely agrarian state). In short, I should put my
own house in order first.
French *is* a horribly gendered language ... German is bad too ... but to
my American ears, those genders are meaningless. German genders make so little
sense to me that I had to learn them by rote, divorcing them of their meanings.
I have learned "das Maedchen" as a literal, and it never occurs to me to wonder
or be offended by the fact that the little girl is always an 'it'.
Similarly, in French a lot of positive qualities are male and a lot of negative
ones are female. You tell me: is this genuine sexism anymore, or do Frenchmen
merely use them as pronouns, without prejudice? Are there Frenchmen who still
believe that all rough beasts are female, or that beastliness is an inherently
female characteristic?
***
I am not two-faced like Sade. I deplore all adultery. There is never a justification
for adultery. But note the definition. If your husband or wife is aware and
has given approval of your fooling around, then it is no longer adultery.
Perhaps it would be better to say I deplore all fraud.
But then, after we stated a similar position in mouth organ, we got mail
saying, "So are you saying that one should never lie to one's spouse?" and,
no, we wouldn't want to say that. A lie is often - usually - easier to swallow
than the corresponding truth. Else why lie in the first place? Some hurts,
I suppose, are small enough to permit the lies. Some hurts, the bigger ones,
one should never lie about.
If that seems backward to you, consider this metaphor, if you please:
A wall in a house is in horrible shape visually. There are little pits,
nail holes, and small cracks in the sheetrock. There is also a huge bend
in the sheetrock where a large object has collided with the wall and cracked
one of the support beams.
You are attempting to sell the house.
The little marks and pits can and should be filled and plastered; they are
only visual anyway. The big one should not be covered up: it is a major piece
of structural damage which the buyer needs to be aware of. If you conceal
it, you are deceiving the buyer in a way which will cause the buyer (and possibly
you, if he sues you) great trouble later.
I like that metaphor. I stole it from myself. :) It's from a mouth organ
column to be finished later tonight on the same subject.
***
You are absolutely correct in one particular: gay groups define themselves
in terms of their sexual identity. *I* define myself in relation to the rest
of the populace in terms of my sexual identity. The whole mouth organ crew
does the same. It is very difficult to think in any other terms, since that
one shouts so much louder than the others. Yes, we're all possibly very intelligent
people: So what? We are not discriminated against nor distinguished by our
intelligence. We don't get worse service at the Burger King (hard to imagine
how it could get worse, but let's go with that) because we walk in reading
The Economist instead of People. We might get worse service if we walked in
reading Playboy though. We'd definitely get worse service if we walked in
arm-in-arm with someone else of the same gender.
It seems natural enough to define one's group in terms of what most sets
that group in antagonism with the rest of the populace. It is distressing
to me that even a tame horse like mouth organ is sufficient to be contraband
reading in some places in this country. It is distressing to me that anal
sex - no matter who practices it - is illegal in Texas. (So is owning more
than five dildos. More than that, and you're a dildo pusher.) And, to come
back to the points which began this whole exchange, it is distressing to me
that in Europe these problems apparently do not exist to the same degree.
There's also a personal issue here: I learn more and more things about this
country to dislike every day. I am not in any danger of defecting - I'm largely
happy here - but it's a wistful thing. Why can't I live somewhere with an
American technology market, a German educational system, and Dutch morals?
From: SAGReiss
Date: 21 December 1997
Subject: Geang gai
The bartender and I shared a laugh over a couple at the club, a lady in
an evening gown and her SO in a tux. Why did we deem this funny? We're probably
two ignorant, homophobic, male chauvanist pigs. (I'm not sure why ignorance
is traditionally thrown into this mix.) Anyway, Columbine, I think your mistake
is not so much holding hands with your ladyfriend as going to Burger King.
Service is bought and sold. There is even such a thing as theft of services.
Restaurants are ruthlessly materialistic places. We care about our tips. Everything
else is irrelevant. Guests generally get the service they deserve. Immediately
order a bottle of wine or a round of drinks and you should get excellent
service. Say that you're in a hurry or ask for separate checks and you'll
probably suffer the fate you deserve. Start dropping five- and ten-dollar
tips on the local waiters and bartenders and see if you don't get their attention.
From: Nichelle
Date: 23 December 1997
Subject: homophobic waiters, etc.
DEATH TO THE CHEAP:
You will have to forgive Gabriel. It is his belief that 'lesbians are cheap-
all waiters know that', not that it matters to him or the other boys at the
club, who earn a wage plus a tip per head and don't have to hustle for tits,
er tips.
SWEET WORDS TO HER LOVE:
Yes, sweetheart, I hate using pine, so will you please forward this to the
list. I miss you. I can't sleep.
SOY TO THE WORLD:
I have failed at my attempts to convince my mother and stepfather to buy
a Tofurkey for Christmas dinner rather than the traditional meal. Even the
other Tofoultry options of Tofoose or Tofuck did not appeal to them, although
all are accompanied by four tempeh drum-ettes and a delicious golden mushroom
gravy.
REMOTE CONTROL TOYS:
I had my first look at a Sony Web-TV last night. My friend Mr. X (not his
real name) has got it, probably because he can't get onto AOL without a computer.
This is the same guy who picked up a six foot tall whore downtown and later
asked me if all women smell that bad "down there". Apparently he payed her
money to come back to his apartment to eat her out. So this is the sort of
guy with a Web-TV. It just doesn't feel like the internet that way. He's such
an asshole, he had to show me all of his favorite humor pages and read them
to me. It took us a while to get through the Mensa version of the Night Before
Christmas. He didn't know most of the words. "Wow, Nicki, you've got such
a big vocab." "Yes, it's even got the word "vocabulary" in it."
ONLY THREE SHOPPING DAYS LEFT:
I have become an efficient shopping machine over the past year and something
since I moved in with Gabriel. Today, mother and I spent an entire day worthlessly
roaming the malls looking for last minute gifts for those 'problem people'.
Mom later commented that I used to be 'the easygoing and laid back one in
the family' and that I am now 'grumpy'. For the record, shopping has always
made me 'grumpy'.
BOBBING LIKE CORKS:
I saw Titanic last night, the movie with the largest budget ever. It was
a grim thing. I liked it despite all of the horrible Hollywoody effects- short
clips, fast camera changes, visciously loud soundtrack... I hate myself for
liking this kind of film, but I was impressed, even despite the cheesy romance
storyline. I think it takes balls to show thousands of people falling to
their deaths, later bobbing frozen and dead in the water.
THE TELEVISION IS BROKEN:
While trying to get it up last night (Web-TV, that is) the television was
playing hard to get with Andrew. It took him four minutes of panic and frenzy
to get the thing to work. I secretly hoped it was broken.
THE SUMMING UP:
I hate the television. I cannot think. There is nothing but noise, confusion
and junk food here. Home is quiet, despite what Gabriel thinks. We're all
friends. We can eat together, be silent while the other types e-mail, understand
the need for things like vegetables and grapefruit... I can't think. I miss
home.
From: SAGReiss
Date: 23 December 1997
Subject: Gender studies
Gender is a grammatical category of articles, nouns and adjectives, like
case and number. It is not to be confused with something that exists in the
real (non-linguistic) world. A language (such as Finnish) can have more than
a dozen cases or fewer than two (subject/object). Similarly many languages
(such as certain dialects of ancient Greek) have three numbers, singular,
dual and plural. Gender is useful in that it allows writers to make neater
distinctions, more complex syntax, longer sentences. It provides clarity.
People who speak only one language do not generally think about it very much,
if at all. It is implicit. English speakers do not think of their verbs' aspect,
another purely grammatical category. I would doubt that anyone on this list
could even identify a verbal aspect. Yet English is a relatively aspect-rich
language, if gender poor. To use the traditional BBC examples: "negatron
is jerking off. He jerks off every day. He hasn't got laid in a while. He's
been working on his intergender communication skills." There are the four
aspects of the English verb, progressive (or continuous), punctual, perfect
and perfect-progressive. I could go on, but this is boring, so back to gender
studies. French gender is inherited from the Latin, which is based on the
Greek, so we'd probably have to look at Indo-European gender tendencies to
get anywhere. German gender is half Germanic, half imported from the Latin
by Martin Luther. A note on women and children: child is neuter in German,
as are the diminutive suffixes. Thus Frauelein and Maedchen must be neuter
because of the endings, which determine gender. Weib (whence wife) is also
neuter, for reasons I don't know.
From: Columbine
Date: 28 December 1997
Subject: Re: Gender studies
>A note on women and children: child is neuter in German, as are
>the diminutive suffixes. Thus Frauelein and Maedchen must be neuter
>because of the endings, which determine gender.
I knew this. My point, I think, was that it's just as stupid and arbitrary
a system as any other. Ideally language would have one gender (in the purely
grammatical sense). But what fun would that be?
From: SAGReiss
Date: 29 December 1997
Subject: Fresh fruit for rotting vegetables
Some days I'm good, boiz & grrls, and some days I just get lucky. I
was casting about for something funny or interesting to write about when
this happened:
You sense that Mauve_Guest is looking for you in The Linen Closet.
It pages, "Good day."
page mauve Who are you?
You sense that Mauve_Guest is looking for you in The Linen Closet.
It pages, "Do you mean my name?"
page mauve I'm fucking busy. Have you got something to say to me or not?
Who the fuck are you?
You sense that Mauve_Guest is looking for you in The Linen Closet.
It pages, "My name is Charles. You don't know me. I wanted to ask if RLMOO
is still a functioning entity or not."
page mauve Well, that makes things clear, Charles. RL MOO is dead, I'm sorry
to say.
You sense that Mauve_Guest is looking for you in The Linen Closet.
It pages, "I'm sorry to hear that. Do you have time to tell me why?"
page mauve I haven't had a good year financially, so I got tired of paying
fifty dollars a month.
You sense that Mauve_Guest is looking for you in The Linen Closet.
It pages, "How frustrating. Do the databases still exist?"
page mauve Yes, my friend has them saved to disk.
You sense that Mauve_Guest is looking for you in The Linen Closet.
It pages, "Would you like RLMOO to exist again?"
page mauve I would like that very much. Are you in the business of giving
out computer space?
You sense that Mauve_Guest is looking for you in The Linen Closet.
It pages, "Yes, if I feel like it. I'm the sysadmin of an ISP, so I can
pretty much do whatever the fuck I want with the servers and the bandwidth.
I'm not going to commit, but I would be interested in finding out what's
involved."
page mauve It's a very small MOO. negatron could tell you more precisely,
if the fucker were ever around when I need him. Why don't you @join me?
Mauve_Guest teleports in.
Mauve_Guest says, "Well, e-mail would be just peachy, too."
You ask, "What's up, Charles? May I ask where you got your interest in RL
MOO?"
Mauve_Guest says, "A random walk. I was on purple-crayon at MIT for a while,
and got intrigued with the notion of MOO as a projection of reality rather
than a workshop for fantasy. An Alta Vista search led to you."
Mauve_Guest says, "Or, more specifically, to RLMOO, but you seemed to be
a nexus for it."
You say, "Well, we tried to create a different kind of MOO, but I can't
say we met with very much success."
Mauve_Guest says, "What was the limiting factor?"
You say, "There are perhaps different answers. Some say that the MOO is
a dying technology. Some say that the big MOOs, LambdaMOO most guiltily,
tend to obliterate the smaller ones. Some say that I'm such an asshole that
no one wants to talk to me."
Mauve_Guest says, "I have to leave soon. Do you know if RLMOO was based
on Lambda's code & core?"
SAGReiss [to Mauve_Guest]: It was. Would you like me to give your e-mail
address to negatron? He can explain. He's a geek.
Mauve_Guest says, "Please. I would have to run it past the CE, but I can't
see that he'd have a problem with it."
You ask, "Thanks. I'll pass it along. I spoke with him this morning, something
about his going to eat his relatives' food and drink their whisky for a few
more days. He might get back to you in a week. Would that be OK?"
Mauve_Guest says, "That's fine. I'll look for it. Adieu."
SAGReiss [to Mauve_Guest]: Later, bro.
Mauve_Guest goes home.
I wanted something amusing to impress our new friend, Veronique, whom some
of you may remember from RL MOO or even Lambda. I was very impressed by the
home-porno-video mpegs she's got on her web site, but she made me promise
not to divulge the address. Anyway it's been more than a year since we brought
in any new blood, so I've taken the liberty. I hope she's not expecting literature,
unless she understands that word the same way I do, which is highly unlikely.
She joked about sending us her food diary, which might fit in quite well in
this "Refrigerator of the Mind". Her address is above, along with Kate's new
one. Here is what she wrote to me:
Misery
Why am I so miserable? To the outsider, I've got it all. Really. I take
stock of myself everyday and I still feel rotten... I'm in my late 20's,
have a good, solid job in a fast-paced company. I've been promoted 3 times
in 3 years and am well known and well respected by my colleagues. I've got
stock options, a brand-new car, just moved to a swank apartment in a luxurious
tower near the city. I've got everything I need. I'm completely single, have
plenty of friends to socialize with, invited to countless parties. So, I'm
totally in control of my life. I've got it all, right? I mean, what else could
I want?
The question is, why am I so damn miserable? I wake up in the morning and
feel completely apathetic - I have to give myself a pep-talk to get myself
to work, a double latte in the car, another 2 cups in the office. Getting
my projects done at work has grown tedious, and I have to force myself to
get
through the day. There's little joy in anything anymore. Basically, I think
my problem is that I've achieved nearly everything so early in life, things
most people don't get until their in their late 30's/40's and there's little
more for me to strive for. Emotionally, I'm a 20-something year old - professionally
I'm a 40-something year old - I'm split right down the middle most of the
time. Thinking one thing, saying another, kissing my bosses' asses, climbing
the proverbial career ladder. But for what ?
If these things aren't making me happy now, then what am I reaching for?
Will more money make me happy? Will a more expensive car make me happy? Will
new friends make me happy? Will new projects at work make me happy? Will a
vacation to a ritzy resort make me happy? What will make me happy?
Maybe I just don't know what happiness is. Maybe my expectations of happiness
are too high? Maybe happiness is something different. Let me know if you figure
it out.
From: Veroneek
Date: 28 December 1997
Subject: Re: Fresh fruit for rotting vegetables (Veronique's rotting stomach)
From: Veroneek
Food and Exercise Diary - December 28th, 1997 (Sunday, bloody Sunday)
11am-12pm: 4 small Homemade buttermilk pancakes with 100% natural Vermont
maple syrup.
3.30pm: 1 small spring roll, 1 small veggie spring roll (totally greasy
- shoulda skipped them)
4.pm: 1 box drink (half pint) of Parmalat skim chocolate milk
6.00pm: Cajun Salad - greens, cheese, tomatoes, cabbage, grilled cajun chicken
slices and honey mustard dressing, on the side. Cup of decaf coffee and cup
of water.
8.25pm: Felt like a Heffer. Running on treadmill in gym for 40 minutes.
Listened to George Michael "Faith" in Walkman. Wanted to listen to Falco,
but the damn tape wasn't in the case.